Prompt as a chess engine: Minimax and pruning applied to arguments?

What is a request to imitate the chess engines with minimax + alpha -beta -beta cut? Here the "pieces" are not farmers or slides, but dialectical movements: a professional, his refutation, the opposite valley, etc. A "path" is the betting sequence of movements that represents a branch of the debate. Example: Thesis "Coffee improves concentration". Path A: Pro ("It contains caffeine, a stimulant") → con ("it can increase fear") → counterbuttal ("in moderate cans, not") → new fraud ("it disturbs the sleep") → New Pro (if it is illustrated in the morning. Circumcision comes here. Only the promising paths. Guaranteed advantage submitted.